Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
In this chapter, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. On the one hand, the notion of bipolarity relies on the presence of two kinds of entities which have a diametrically opposed nature and which represent repellent forces (a positive entity and a negative entity). The notion exists in various domains (for example with the representation of preferences in ar...
متن کاملOn the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
In this paper, we propose a survey of the use of bipolarity in argumentation frameworks, i.e. the presence of two kinds of entities (a positive entity and a negative entity). An argumentation process follows three steps: building the arguments and the interactions between them, valuating the arguments using or not the interactions and finally defining the acceptability of the arguments. This pa...
متن کاملContradiction in Argumentation Frameworks
We present a theory of argumentation that can deal with contradiction within an argumentation framework, thus solving a problem posed in [1]. By representing logic programs as sets of interacting arguments, we can apply our results for general argumentation frameworks to logicprogramming semantics. This yields a new semantics for logic programs that properly extends traditional approaches such ...
متن کاملAudiences in argumentation frameworks
Although reasoning about what is the case has been the historic focus of logic, reasoning about what should be done is an equally important capacity for an intelligent agent. Reasoning about what to do in a given situation termed practical reasoning in the philosophical literature has important differences from reasoning about what is the case. The acceptability of an argument for an action tur...
متن کاملValue Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks
Hierarchical argumentation frameworks organise Dung argumentation frameworks into a hierarchy so that argumentation over preference information in a level n Dung framework is used to resolve conflicts between arguments in a level n1 framework. In this paper we formalise and extend value based argumentation [1] in a hierarchical argumentation framework and illustrate application of the resulting...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0888-613X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2017.01.013